Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/10725
Title: A cross-linguistic study of the acquisition of clitic and pronoun production
Authors: Belletti, Adriana 
Costa, João 
Friedmann, Naama 
Gavarró, Anna 
Grohmann, Kleanthes K. 
Guasti, Maria Teresa 
Tuller, Laurice 
Lobo, Maria 
Anđelković, Darinka 
Argemí, Núria 
Avram, Larisa 
Berends, Sanne 
Brunetto, Valentina 
Delage, Hélène 
Ezeizabarrena, María-José 
Fattal, Iris 
Haman, Ewa 
Van Hout, Angeliek 
Jensen De López, Kristine 
Katsos, Napoleon 
Kologranic, Lana 
Krstić, Nadezda 
Kraljevic, Jelena Kuvac 
Miękisz, Aneta 
Nerantzini, Michaela 
Queraltó, Clara 
Radic, Zeljana 
Ruiz, Sílvia 
Sauerland, Uli 
Sevcenco, Anca 
Smoczyńska, Magdalena 
Theodorou, Eleni 
Van Der Lely, Heather 
Veenstra, Alma 
Weston, John 
Yachini, Maya 
Yatsushiro, Kazuko 
Major Field of Science: Humanities
Field Category: Languages and Literature
Keywords: Test;Pronoun languages;Clitic language
Issue Date: 28-May-2015
Source: Language Acquisition, 2016, vol. 23, no.1, pp. 1-26
Volume: 23
Issue: 1
Start page: 1
End page: 26
Journal: Language Acquisition 
Abstract: This study develops a single elicitation method to test the acquisition of third-person pronominal objects in 5-year-olds for 16 languages. This methodology allows us to compare the acquisition of pronominals in languages that lack object clitics (“pronoun languages”) with languages that employ clitics in the relevant context (“clitic languages”), thus establishing a robust cross-linguistic baseline in the domain of clitic and pronoun production for 5-year-olds. High rates of pronominal production are found in our results, indicating that children have the relevant pragmatic knowledge required to select a pronominal in the discourse setting involved in the experiment as well as the relevant morphosyntactic knowledge involved in the production of pronominals. It is legitimate to conclude from our data that a child who at age 5 is not able to produce any or few pronominals is a child at risk for language impairment. In this way, pronominal production can be taken as a developmental marker, provided that one takes into account certain crosslinguistic differences discussed in the article.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/10725
ISSN: 10489223
DOI: 10.1080/10489223.2015.1028628
Rights: Taylor & Francis
Type: Article
Affiliation : National and Kapodistrian University of Athens 
University of Siena 
New University of Lisbon 
Tel Aviv University 
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona 
University of Cyprus 
University of Milano-Bicocca 
Université François-Rabelais 
University of Belgrade 
University of Bucharest 
University of Groningen 
University of Geneva 
University of the Basque Country 
University of Warsaw 
Aalborg University 
University of Cambridge 
University of Zagreb 
Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft 
Educational Research Institute 
Harvard University 
Université Catholique de Louvain 
University of Groningen 
University of London 
Max Planck Institute 
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles

CORE Recommender
Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

44
checked on Nov 9, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

42
Last Week
0
Last month
1
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s) 50

393
Last Week
1
Last month
2
checked on Dec 22, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons