Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/1037
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChryssanthopoulos, Marios K.-
dc.contributor.authorVotsis, Renos-
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-08T13:37:40Zen
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-17T10:30:38Z-
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-02T08:42:52Z-
dc.date.available2013-03-08T13:37:40Zen
dc.date.available2013-05-17T10:30:38Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-02T08:42:52Z-
dc.date.issued2009-04-
dc.identifier.citationConstruction and Building Materials, 2009, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1690-1697en_US
dc.identifier.issn09500618-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/1037-
dc.description.abstractPultruded sections are used in many different civil engineering applications involving FRP composites, including a number of footbridges. These sections are typically joined through adhesive bonding and/or mechanical interlock. The joint is clearly critical to load transfer and the avoidance of unintended failure modes. As a contribution towards studying damage identification and assessment in FRP joints, this paper examines the dynamic performance of bonded GFRP pultruded sections. Experimental testing and FE modelling were employed to model damage in the joints and to assess whether debonding can be detected through differences in the dynamic characteristics - namely frequencies and mode shapes - of the components. Debonding in the joints was simulated by progressively reducing their bonded area. Four damage identification techniques (based on modal curvature, flexibility, damage index and the curvature of the flexibility-based uniform load surface) were used to assess damage. The results show that significant damage has to be present before debonding can be identified through changes in resonant frequencies and mode shapes. Once such levels are present, damage identification techniques can be applied effectively to locate damage. It is concluded that vibration-based damage assessment methods should be used in conjunction with other non-destructive evaluation techniques.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofConstruction and Building Materialsen_US
dc.rights© Elsevieren_US
dc.subjectGFRP jointsen_US
dc.subjectVibration testingen_US
dc.subjectDamage assessmenten_US
dc.subjectPultruded sectionsen_US
dc.titleAssessment of debonding in gfrp joints using damage identification techniquesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.affiliationCyprus University of Technologyen
dc.collaborationUniversity of Surreyen_US
dc.subject.categoryCivil Engineeringen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryUnited Kingdomen_US
dc.subject.fieldEngineering and Technologyen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.10.015en_US
dc.dept.handle123456789/54en
dc.relation.issue4en_US
dc.relation.volume23en_US
cut.common.academicyear2008-2009en_US
dc.identifier.spage1690en_US
dc.identifier.epage1697en_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.journal.journalissn0950-0618-
crisitem.journal.publisherElsevier-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Civil Engineering and Geomatics-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-4433-2184-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on Nov 9, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 20

3
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

506
Last Week
3
Last month
15
checked on May 14, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.