Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/1009
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorForster, Helga-
dc.contributor.authorAdaskaveg, James-
dc.contributor.authorKanetis, Loukas-
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-10T10:49:47Zen
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-17T07:13:08Z-
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-02T08:37:55Z-
dc.date.available2013-01-10T10:49:47Zen
dc.date.available2013-05-17T07:13:08Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-02T08:37:55Z-
dc.date.issued2010-08-
dc.identifier.citationPhytopathology, 2010, vol. 100, no. 8, pp. 738-746en_US
dc.identifier.issn19437684-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/1009-
dc.description.abstractFungicide resistance was identified in natural populations of Penicillium digitatum, the causal agent of green mold of citrus, to two of three new postharvest fungicides before their commercial use. Using a new air-sampling method where large populations of the pathogen in citrus packinghouses were exposed to agar plates with a continuous, wide-range fungicide concentration gradient, isolates with reduced sensitivity to fludioxonil or pyrimethanil were obtained. Resistance frequencies to fludioxonil and pyrimethanil were calculated as 9.5 x 10-7 to 1.5 x 10-5 and 7.3 x 10-6 to 6.2 x 10-5, respectively. No isolates resistant to azoxystrobin were detected. Isolates with reduced sensitivity to fludioxonil or pyrimethanil were also obtained in laboratory selection studies, where high concentrations of conidial mixtures of isolates sensitive to the three fungicides were plated onto agar amended with each fungicide at 10 ug/ml. Isolates obtained from fludioxonil selection plates in laboratory and packinghouse experiments were placed into two categories based on mycelial growth: moderately resistant isolates had 50% effective concentration (EC50) values of 0.1 to 0.82 ug/ml and highly resistant isolates had EC50 values > 1.5 μg/ml. Isolates resistant to pyrimethanil all had EC50 values >8 μg/ml. Representative isolates of the two categories with reduced sensitivity to fludioxonil varied widely in their virulence and sporulation capacity as measured by the incidence of decay and degree of sporulation on inoculated fruit, respectively, whereas pyrimethanil-resistant isolates were mostly similar to the wild-type isolate. Fungicide sensitivity characteristics for isolates from fludioxonil and pyrimethanil selection plates remained stable after passages on nonamended agar, and disease could not be controlled after treatment with the respective fungicides. Types of fungicide resistance were visualized on thiabendazole- (TBZ) and imazalil-amended selection plates that were exposed in packinghouses where resistance to these fungicides was known to occur. The qualitative, single-site resistance to the benzimi- dazole TBZ was visualized by two distinct subpopulations in regard to fungicide sensitivity, whereas the quantitative, multi-site resistance to the demethylation inhibitor imazalil was apparent as a continuous density gradient of colonies along the fungicide concentration gradient. Types of resistance could not be assigned to fludioxonil or pyrimethanil because a limited number of resistant colonies was obtained on each plate. Thus, with this new method, we were able to estimate fungicide resistance frequencies as well as characterize and visualize types of resistance within populations of a fungal species. This information will be used to design resistance management strategies for previous and newly registered postharvest fungicides of citrusen_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPhytopathologyen_US
dc.rights© The American Phytopathological Societyen_US
dc.subjectFungicidesen_US
dc.subjectBotrytis cinereaen_US
dc.subjectCinerea isolatesen_US
dc.titleDetermination of natural resistance frequencies in Penicillium digitatum using a new air-sampling method and characterization of fludioxonil- and pyrimethanil-resistant isolatesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.affiliationCyprus University of Technologyen
dc.collaborationUniversity of Californiaen_US
dc.subject.categoryAGRICULTURAL SCIENCESen_US
dc.subject.categoryAgricultural Biotechnologyen_US
dc.subject.categoryOther Agricultural Sciencesen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryUnited Statesen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldAgricultural Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1094/PHYTO-100-8-0738en_US
dc.dept.handle123456789/54en
dc.relation.issue8en_US
dc.relation.volume100en_US
cut.common.academicyear2010-2011en_US
dc.identifier.spage738en_US
dc.identifier.epage746en_US
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food Science-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-1869-558X-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1943-7684-
crisitem.journal.publisherAmerican Phytopathological Society-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

23
checked on Nov 9, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 20

21
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

457
Last Week
2
Last month
2
checked on Jan 31, 2025

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.