Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/10015
Title: Actor groups, related needs, and challenges at the climate downscaling interface
Authors: Rössler, Ole 
Benestad, Rasmus E. 
Vlachogannis, Diamando 
Heike, Hübener 
Kanamaru, Hideki 
Pagé, Christian 
Cardoso, Rita M. 
Soares, Pedro 
Maraun, Douglas 
Kreienkamp, Frank 
Christodoulides, Paul 
Fischer, Andreas 
Szabo, Peter 
Major Field of Science: Engineering and Technology
Field Category: Electrical Engineering - Electronic Engineering - Information Engineering
Keywords: Climate data providers;Climate data users;Climate downscaling interfacec
Issue Date: Apr-2016
Source: EGU General Assembly, 2016, 17-22 April 2016, Vienna Austria
Conference: EGU General Assembly 
Abstract: At the climate downscaling interface, numerous downscaling techniques and different philosophies compete on being the best method in their specific terms. Thereby, it remains unclear to what extent and for which purpose these downscaling techniques are valid or even the most appropriate choice. A common validation framework that compares all the different available methods was missing so far. The initiative VALUE closes this gap with such a common validation framework. An essential part of a validation framework for downscaling techniques is the definition of appropriate validation measures. The selection of validation measures should consider the needs of the stakeholder: some might need a temporal or spatial average of a certain variable, others might need temporal or spatial distributions of some variables, still others might need extremes for the variables of interest or even inter-variable dependencies. Hence, a close interaction of climate data providers and climate data users is necessary. Thus, the challenge in formulating a common validation framework mirrors also the challenges between the climate data providers and the impact assessment community. This poster elaborates the issues and challenges at the downscaling interface as it is seen within the VALUE community. It suggests three different actor groups: one group consisting of the climate data providers, the other two groups being climate data users (impact modellers and societal users). Hence, the downscaling interface faces classical transdisciplinary challenges. We depict a graphical illustration of actors involved and their interactions. In addition, we identified four different types of issues that need to be considered: i.e. data based, knowledge based, communication based, and structural issues. They all may, individually or jointly, hinder an optimal exchange of data and information between the actor groups at the downscaling interface. Finally, some possible ways to tackle these issues are discussed.
URI: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/10015
Rights: © Author(s) 2016. CC Attribution 3.0 License.
Type: Conference Papers
Affiliation : Institute for Geography 
The Norwegian Meteorological Institute 
Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory Inrastes, NCSR "Demokritos” 
Hessian Agency for Nature Conservation 
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations 
University of Lisbon 
Wegener Center for Climate and Global Change 
Deutscher Wetterdienst 
Cyprus University of Technology 
Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss 
Hungarian Meteorological Service 
Publication Type: Peer Reviewed
Appears in Collections:Δημοσιεύσεις σε συνέδρια /Conference papers or poster or presentation

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Paul Christodoulides.pdf© Author(s) 2016. CC Attribution 3.0 License.35.64 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show full item record

Page view(s) 50

539
Last Week
0
Last month
3
checked on Nov 6, 2024

Download(s) 50

117
checked on Nov 6, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.