Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/10015
Title: | Actor groups, related needs, and challenges at the climate downscaling interface | Authors: | Rössler, Ole Benestad, Rasmus E. Vlachogannis, Diamando Heike, Hübener Kanamaru, Hideki Pagé, Christian Cardoso, Rita M. Soares, Pedro Maraun, Douglas Kreienkamp, Frank Christodoulides, Paul Fischer, Andreas Szabo, Peter |
Major Field of Science: | Engineering and Technology | Field Category: | Electrical Engineering - Electronic Engineering - Information Engineering | Keywords: | Climate data providers;Climate data users;Climate downscaling interfacec | Issue Date: | Apr-2016 | Source: | EGU General Assembly, 2016, 17-22 April 2016, Vienna Austria | Conference: | EGU General Assembly | Abstract: | At the climate downscaling interface, numerous downscaling techniques and different philosophies compete on being the best method in their specific terms. Thereby, it remains unclear to what extent and for which purpose these downscaling techniques are valid or even the most appropriate choice. A common validation framework that compares all the different available methods was missing so far. The initiative VALUE closes this gap with such a common validation framework. An essential part of a validation framework for downscaling techniques is the definition of appropriate validation measures. The selection of validation measures should consider the needs of the stakeholder: some might need a temporal or spatial average of a certain variable, others might need temporal or spatial distributions of some variables, still others might need extremes for the variables of interest or even inter-variable dependencies. Hence, a close interaction of climate data providers and climate data users is necessary. Thus, the challenge in formulating a common validation framework mirrors also the challenges between the climate data providers and the impact assessment community. This poster elaborates the issues and challenges at the downscaling interface as it is seen within the VALUE community. It suggests three different actor groups: one group consisting of the climate data providers, the other two groups being climate data users (impact modellers and societal users). Hence, the downscaling interface faces classical transdisciplinary challenges. We depict a graphical illustration of actors involved and their interactions. In addition, we identified four different types of issues that need to be considered: i.e. data based, knowledge based, communication based, and structural issues. They all may, individually or jointly, hinder an optimal exchange of data and information between the actor groups at the downscaling interface. Finally, some possible ways to tackle these issues are discussed. | URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/10015 | Rights: | © Author(s) 2016. CC Attribution 3.0 License. | Type: | Conference Papers | Affiliation : | Institute for Geography The Norwegian Meteorological Institute Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory Inrastes, NCSR "Demokritos” Hessian Agency for Nature Conservation Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations University of Lisbon Wegener Center for Climate and Global Change Deutscher Wetterdienst Cyprus University of Technology Federal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwiss Hungarian Meteorological Service |
Publication Type: | Peer Reviewed |
Appears in Collections: | Δημοσιεύσεις σε συνέδρια /Conference papers or poster or presentation |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Paul Christodoulides.pdf | © Author(s) 2016. CC Attribution 3.0 License. | 35.64 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
CORE Recommender
Page view(s) 50
540
Last Week
0
0
Last month
3
3
checked on Nov 21, 2024
Download(s) 50
117
checked on Nov 21, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.