Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/3447
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Baka, Aphrodite | - |
dc.contributor.author | Figgou, Lia | - |
dc.contributor.author | Triga, Vasiliki | - |
dc.date | 2012 | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-07-09T06:20:13Z | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-12-08T09:14:06Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2014-07-09T06:20:13Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2015-12-08T09:14:06Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | International Journal of Electronic Governance, 2012, vol.5, no.3/4, pp.244-263 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 17427517 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/3447 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This paper explores the meanings attributed to the middle category of a 5-point Likert scale that is commonly used by Voting Advice Applications (VAAs). Data was collected from 71 users of the VAA 'Helpmevote' (October 2010 for the Greek local elections), who were asked to justify their middle point answers. According to thematic analysis of the participants' answers, the middle points were used to convey lack of knowledge, but also dilemmas and rejection of the items' assumptions. Such findings address methodological issues related to the design of VAAs and set some goals for their future design. Copyright 2012 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd. | en_US |
dc.format | en_US | |
dc.language | English | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal of Electronic Governance | en_US |
dc.rights | © 2014 Inderscience Enterprises | en_US |
dc.subject | Voting advice applications | en_US |
dc.subject | Local Elections | en_US |
dc.subject | Electoral campaigns | en_US |
dc.subject | Methodological design | en_US |
dc.subject | Electronic democracy | en_US |
dc.subject | Electoral Behaviour | en_US |
dc.subject | VAA design | en_US |
dc.subject | Likert scale | en_US |
dc.subject.classification | Media and Communications | - |
dc.title | 'Neither Agree, Nor Disagree': A Critical Analysis of the Middle Answer Category in Voting Advice Applications | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |
dc.collaboration | Aristotle University of Thessaloniki | en_US |
dc.collaboration | Cyprus University of Technology | en_US |
dc.subject.category | Political Science | en_US |
dc.journals | Subscription | en_US |
dc.review | PEER-REVIEWED | - |
dc.country | Greece | en_US |
dc.country | Cyprus | en_US |
dc.subject.field | Social Sciences | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1504/IJEG.2012.051306 | en_US |
dc.dept.handle | 123456789/100 | en |
dc.relation.issue | 3/4 | en_US |
dc.relation.volume | 5 | en_US |
cut.common.academicyear | 2012-2013 | en_US |
dc.identifier.spage | 244 | en_US |
dc.identifier.epage | 263 | en_US |
item.openairetype | article | - |
item.grantfulltext | none | - |
item.cerifentitytype | Publications | - |
item.openairecristype | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | - |
item.languageiso639-1 | en | - |
item.fulltext | No Fulltext | - |
crisitem.author.dept | Department of Communication and Marketing | - |
crisitem.author.faculty | Faculty of Communication and Media Studies | - |
crisitem.author.orcid | 0000-0001-6932-5389 | - |
crisitem.author.parentorg | Faculty of Communication and Media Studies | - |
crisitem.journal.journalissn | 17427509 | - |
crisitem.journal.publisher | Inderscience | - |
Appears in Collections: | Άρθρα/Articles |
CORE Recommender
SCOPUSTM
Citations
70
checked on Nov 9, 2023
Page view(s) 1
925
Last Week
1
1
Last month
6
6
checked on Dec 11, 2024
Google ScholarTM
Check
Altmetric
Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.