Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/3447
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBaka, Aphrodite-
dc.contributor.authorFiggou, Lia-
dc.contributor.authorTriga, Vasiliki-
dc.date2012en
dc.date.accessioned2014-07-09T06:20:13Z-
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-08T09:14:06Z-
dc.date.available2014-07-09T06:20:13Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-08T09:14:06Z-
dc.date.issued2012-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Electronic Governance, 2012, vol.5, no.3/4, pp.244-263en_US
dc.identifier.issn17427517-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/3447-
dc.description.abstractThis paper explores the meanings attributed to the middle category of a 5-point Likert scale that is commonly used by Voting Advice Applications (VAAs). Data was collected from 71 users of the VAA 'Helpmevote' (October 2010 for the Greek local elections), who were asked to justify their middle point answers. According to thematic analysis of the participants' answers, the middle points were used to convey lack of knowledge, but also dilemmas and rejection of the items' assumptions. Such findings address methodological issues related to the design of VAAs and set some goals for their future design. Copyright 2012 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.languageEnglishen
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Electronic Governanceen_US
dc.rights© 2014 Inderscience Enterprisesen_US
dc.subjectVoting advice applicationsen_US
dc.subjectLocal Electionsen_US
dc.subjectElectoral campaignsen_US
dc.subjectMethodological designen_US
dc.subjectElectronic democracyen_US
dc.subjectElectoral Behaviouren_US
dc.subjectVAA designen_US
dc.subjectLikert scaleen_US
dc.subject.classificationMedia and Communications-
dc.title'Neither Agree, Nor Disagree': A Critical Analysis of the Middle Answer Category in Voting Advice Applicationsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationAristotle University of Thessalonikien_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.subject.categoryPolitical Scienceen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.reviewPEER-REVIEWED-
dc.countryGreeceen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1504/IJEG.2012.051306en_US
dc.dept.handle123456789/100en
dc.relation.issue3/4en_US
dc.relation.volume5en_US
cut.common.academicyear2012-2013en_US
dc.identifier.spage244en_US
dc.identifier.epage263en_US
item.openairetypearticle-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Communication and Marketing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-6932-5389-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
crisitem.journal.journalissn17427509-
crisitem.journal.publisherInderscience-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

70
checked on Nov 9, 2023

Page view(s) 1

925
Last Week
1
Last month
6
checked on Dec 11, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.