Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Euthanasia an active area of research in contemporary bioethics: challenges for the society and the professionals of health-care||Authors:||Tsounis, Andreas
|Keywords:||Euthanasia;Legal regulations;Literature review||Category:||Health Sciences||Field:||Medical and Health Sciences||Issue Date:||2012||Publisher:||Ένωση Νοσηλευτών Ελλάδος||Source:||Hellenic Journal of Nursing Science||Link:||http://magazine.enne.gr/?p=1391||Abstract:||Introduction: Euthanasia refers to the practice of intentionally ending a life in order to relieve pain and suffering. Aim of this review is to present different views and arguments about euthanasia and to discuss the legal regulations and the way that modern societies confront the inevitable dilemmas that it brings in surface. A literature review was conducted on google scholar for articles about the theme using as key words: euthanasia, active, passive, pros/cons, legislation. Results: The results of the literature review came up with its pros and cons of it. Some of the pros are that it provides a way to relieve extreme pain, a way of relief when a person's quality of life is low and an insurance of the rights of dignity and self-determination. The basic cons of it is that it devalues human life, it has become a means of health care cost containment and that there are objections about the expressions of willingness for people under high psychological pressure or for population groups like older people with dementia or mentally ill. Under the pressure of the new circumstances in the last decades, Euthanasia became the subject of legislative interventions in a number of countries. But even the most complete regulatory framework cannot predict all the aspects. Every different case will always be a confrontation with important existential and emotional issues. Conclusion: Before resulting in Euthanasia, a person must consider the situation. There are a lot of circumstances under which euthanasia is a reasonable and responsible choice. Each case is different from another.||URI:||http://ktisis.cut.ac.cy/handle/10488/4598||ISSN:||1791-9002||Type:||Article|
|Appears in Collections:||Άρθρα/Articles|
Show full item record
checked on Jul 16, 2019
checked on Jul 16, 2019
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.