Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ktisis.cut.ac.cy/handle/10488/4125
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKambanaros, Maria-
dc.contributor.otherΚαμπανάρου, Μαρία-
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-05T10:49:44Z-
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-02T08:48:37Z-
dc.date.available2015-03-05T10:49:44Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-02T08:48:37Z-
dc.date.issued2010-
dc.identifier.citationAphasiology, 2010, Volume 24, Issue 2, Pages 210-230en
dc.identifier.issn1464-5041-
dc.identifier.urihttp://ktisis.cut.ac.cy/handle/10488/4125-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Recently, verb–noun processing differences were reported in a group of late bilingual speakers with fluent, anomic aphasia in Greek (L1) as well as in English (L2) (Kambanaros & van Steenbrugge, 2006). The findings revealed that verb production was significantly more impaired than noun production in both languages during picture naming despite preserved comprehension of action and object names. Aims: The aim of this study is to investigate the total number (quantity) and the diversity (quality or different types) of verbs and nouns produced in conversational speech by the same group of bilingual anomic individuals with aphasia and compare the results to (i) those of the non-brain-injured control group and (ii) their action and object naming performances at the single word level, to determine if grammatical class impairments are also evident in spontaneous speech. Methods & Procedures: In order to examine the distribution and diversity of verbs and nouns in spontaneous speech, speech samples of 300 words were collected from the bilingual individuals with fluent aphasia and their controls in L1 and in L2 on two separate occasions, 1 week apart. In addition, two subtests from the Greek Object and Action Test (GOAT: Kambanaros, 2003), the object and action naming subtests, were presented on two separate occasions, 1 week apart, to both groups of bilingual participants in L1 and L2 (cf. Kambanaros & van Steenbrugge, 2006). Outcomes & Results: Late bilingual participants with anomia showed no difficulties retrieving verbs in spontaneous speech in L1 or L2 despite a significant verb deficit in both languages on action naming tasks. However the bilingual group had significant difficulties in relation to noun production in spontaneous speech in L1 and L2. Conclusions: Picture naming remains the standard of word retrieval ability in aphasia. However, object and action naming scores can underestimate and/or overestimate word retrieval performance for nouns and verbs in connected speech.en
dc.formatpdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen
dc.rights© 2010 Psychology Pressen
dc.subjectNamingen
dc.subjectSpontaneous speechen
dc.subjectBilingual aphasiaen
dc.titleAction and object naming versus verb and noun retrieval in connected speech: comparisons in late bilingual Greek–English anomic speakersen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.collaborationTechnological and Educational Institute of Patras-
dc.subject.categoryClinical Medicineen
dc.journalsSubscription-
dc.reviewPeer Revieweden
dc.countryGreece-
dc.subject.fieldMedical and Health Sciencesen
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/02687030902958332en
dc.dept.handle123456789/54en
item.languageiso639-1other-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5857-9460-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

23
checked on Jun 11, 2019

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 50

19
checked on Oct 22, 2019

Page view(s) 50

142
Last Week
16
Last month
12
checked on Oct 24, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.