Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://ktisis.cut.ac.cy/handle/10488/14100
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMenna, F.-
dc.contributor.authorNocerino, E.-
dc.contributor.authorAgrafiotis, Panagiotis-
dc.contributor.authorSkarlatos, Dimitrios-
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-26T08:21:40Z-
dc.date.available2019-06-26T08:21:40Z-
dc.date.issued2019-04-17-
dc.identifier.citationUnderwater 3D Recording and Modelling ""A Tool for Modern Applications and CH Recording""; Limassol; Cyprus; 2 May 2019 through 3 May 2019en_US
dc.identifier.issn2194-9042-
dc.descriptionISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences Volume 42, Issue 2/W10, 17 April 2019, Pages 175-180en_US
dc.description.abstractGiven the rise and wide adoption of Structure from Motion (SfM) and Multi View Stereo (MVS) in underwater archaeology, this paper investigates the optimal option for surveying ground control point networks. Such networks are the essential framework for coregistration of photogrammetric 3D models acquired in different epochs, and consecutive archaeological related study and analysis. Above the water, on land, coordinates of ground control points are determined with geodetic methods and are considered often definitive. Other survey works are then derived from by using those coordinates as fixed (being ground control points coordinates considered of much higher precision). For this reason, equipment of proven precision is used with methods that not only compute the most correct values (according to the least squares principle) but also provide numerical measures of their precisions and reliability. Under the water, there are two options for surveying such control networks: trilateration and photogrammetry, with the former being the choice of the majority of archaeological expeditions so far. It has been adopted because of ease of implementation and under the assumption that it is more reliable and precise than photogrammetry.This work aims at investigating the precision of network establishment by both methodologies by comparing them in a typical underwater archaeological site. Photogrammetric data were acquired and analysed, while the trilateration data were simulated under certain assumptions. Direct comparison of standard deviation values of both methodologies reveals a clear advantage of photogrammetry in the vertical (Z) axis and three times better results in horizontal precision.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensingen_US
dc.rights© Author(s). This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectArchaeologyen_US
dc.subjectNetworksen_US
dc.subjectPhotogrammetryen_US
dc.subjectPrecisionen_US
dc.subjectSfMen_US
dc.subjectUnderwateren_US
dc.titlePrecision potential of underwater networks for archaelogical excavation through trilateration and photogrammetryen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationBruno Kessler Foundationen_US
dc.collaborationUniversité De Toulonen_US
dc.collaborationInstitute of Theoretical Physicsen_US
dc.subject.categoryCivil Engineeringen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryFranceen_US
dc.countryItalyen_US
dc.countrySwitzerlanden_US
dc.subject.fieldEngineering and Technologyen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.relation.conferenceUnderwater 3D Recording and Modellingen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W10-175-2019en_US
dc.relation.issue2/W10en_US
dc.relation.volume42en_US
cut.common.academicyear2018-2019en_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Civil Engineering and Geomatics-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Civil Engineering and Geomatics-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4474-5007-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-2732-4780-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.journal.journalissn0924-2716-
crisitem.journal.publisherElsevier-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
isprs-archives-XLII-2-W10-175-2019.pdfOpen Access1.59 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 50

3
checked on Jul 30, 2020

Page view(s)

56
Last Week
0
Last month
5
checked on Aug 5, 2020

Download(s) 50

10
checked on Aug 5, 2020

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons