Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Accounting for diversity in subjective judgments||Authors:||Karapanos, Evangelos
Martens, Jean Bernard O.S.
|Keywords:||Multi-dimensional scaling;Quantitative methods;Repertory grid;Subjective judgments;User experience||Category:||Computer and Information Sciences||Field:||Natural Sciences||Issue Date:||Apr-2009||Publisher:||ACM||Source:||7th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2009, 4-9 April, Boston, MA, United States||Conference:||7th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems||Abstract:||In this paper we argue against averaging as a common practice in the analysis of subjective attribute judgments, both across and within subjects. Previous work has raised awareness of the diversity between individuals' perceptions. In this paper it will furthermore become apparent that such diversity can also exist within a single individual, in the sense that different attribute judgments from a subject may reveal different, complementary, views. A Multi- Dimensional Scaling approach that accounts for the diverse views on a set of stimuli is proposed and its added value is illustrated using published data. We will illustrate that the averaging analysis provides insight to only l/6th of the total number of attributes in the example dataset. The proposed approach accounts for more than double the information obtained from the average model, and provides richer and semantically diverse views on the set of stimuli.||URI:||http://ktisis.cut.ac.cy/handle/10488/13342||DOI:||10.1145/1518701.1518801||Rights:||Copyright 2009 ACM.||Type:||Conference Papers|
|Appears in Collections:||Δημοσιεύσεις σε συνέδρια/Conference papers|
Show full item record
checked on Nov 17, 2019
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.