Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/8726
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMiddleton, Nicos-
dc.contributor.authorEconomou, Mary-
dc.contributor.authorHadjiona, V.-
dc.contributor.authorKouta, Christiana-
dc.contributor.authorLambrinou, Ekaterini-
dc.contributor.authorPaphiti-Demetriou, I.-
dc.contributor.authorHadjigeorgiou, Eleni-
dc.contributor.authorTryfonos, F.-
dc.contributor.authorFilippou, E.-
dc.contributor.authorKolokotroni, Ourania-
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-28T05:35:56Z-
dc.date.available2016-07-28T05:35:56Z-
dc.date.issued2015-09-05-
dc.identifier.citationThe European Journal of Public Health, 2015, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 53.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/8726-
dc.description.abstractBackground.Even though the effectiveness of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative's (BFHI) ‘10 steps' for successful breastfeeding has been widely documented, more than two decades later there is still concern that implementation is fragmented. To date, no hospital in Cyprus has the BFHI title and there is only anecdotal evidence with regards to the implementation of the 10 steps.Methods.The degree of implementation of the ‘10 steps' as well as the International Code of Marketing of Breast-milk Substitutes (ICMBS) across all public maternity wards (N = 5) and 29 (of 35) private clinics in Cyprus was assessed based on the responses of a consecutive sample of 568 mothers (response 70.8%) during the study period using the 24 multiple choice WHO/UNICEF BFHI self-assessment questionnaire.Results.There appears to be relatively good adherence to the ICMBS across Cypriot maternity units with 80.9% and 74.4% in public and private clinics respectively reporting not been given leaflets or supplies. A higher degree of implementation was observed with regards to assistance in breastfeeding skills development (step 5) along with encouragement of breastfeeding on demand (step 8). However, only 26.9% of mothers experienced skin-to-skin contact (step 4) while rooming-in (step 7) was more widely practiced in the public sector (60%) compared to the private sector (20%). The lowest implementation was observed with regards to step 9, which refers to the use of pacifiers and bottles.Conclusion.It is not surprising that initiation and continuation of exclusive breastfeeding are particularly low since based on mothers' assessment there appears to be a significant gap in the implementation of the 10 Steps for Successful Breastfeeding practices across Cypriot maternity clinics. This highlights the need for a national breastfeeding strategy including health professional educational interventions as well as nationwide awareness and civic engagement campaigns.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean Journal of Public Healthen_US
dc.rights© The Authoren_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectBreastfeedingen_US
dc.subjectMaternityen_US
dc.subjectMothersen_US
dc.subjectClinicsen_US
dc.titleImplementation of the ‘10 Steps for Successful Breastfeeding' across maternity clinics in Cyprusen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus Breastfeeding Association – ''Gift for Life''en_US
dc.subject.categoryClinical Medicineen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/eurpub/ckv168.053en_US
dc.dept.handle123456789/118en
dc.relation.issue3en_US
dc.relation.volume25en_US
cut.common.academicyear2015-2016en_US
dc.identifier.spage53en_US
dc.identifier.epage53en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1464-360X-
crisitem.journal.publisherOxford University Press-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.deptCyprus International Institute for Environmental and Public Health-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-6358-8591-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-0522-4671-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-2079-638X-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-2601-8861-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5834-4207-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-7653-002X-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
ckv168.053.pdfFulltext81.45 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

Page view(s) 50

407
Last Week
4
Last month
11
checked on May 17, 2024

Download(s) 50

22
checked on May 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons