Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/8575
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPetinou, Kakia-
dc.contributor.authorSchwartz, R.-
dc.contributor.authorGravel, J.-
dc.contributor.authorLawrence, J.R.-
dc.contributor.otherΠετινου, Κακια-
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-01T08:08:50Z-
dc.date.available2016-07-01T08:08:50Z-
dc.date.issued2001-01-
dc.identifier.citationInternational Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 2001, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 21-42en_US
dc.identifier.issn14606984-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/8575-
dc.description.abstractThis investigation examined the effects of otitis media with effusion (OME) and its associated fluctuating conductive hearing loss on the perception of phonological and morphophonological /s/ and /z/ in young children. We predicted that children free of OME (OME) would perform better than children with histories of OME (OME+). We also predicted that for the OME+ group morphological perception would be harder than phonological perception, because the former category carries an additional linguistic load (i.e., plurality). Sixteen children, ages 26 to 28 months (M =26.5, SD=0.6) were divided into two groups, the OME (n =8) and OME + (n =8) based on OME history during the first year of life. Subjects in the OME group were free of the disease for 4/5 visits and pure tone average (PTA) was 12.6 dB HL (SD=4.8). Subjects in the OME+ group had the disease on 3/5 visits and PTA was 23dB HL (SD=2.7). Experimental stimuli were six monosyllabic novel word-pairs. Members of each word-pair differed only in the presence of final voiced or voiceless fricative, marking the targets phonologically (e.g., [g6]/[g6 s] as in ‘law’, ‘loss’) or morphophonologically (e.g., [dæp]/[dæps] as in ‘map’ ‘maps’). Subjects were taught the unfamiliar word pairs using a fast mapping procedure. Perception was tested with the bimodal preferential looking paradigm. Children in the OME group performed significantly better than their OME+ counterparts. Individual word-pair analyses showed that OME+ group performed more poorly than the OME group on one phonological and on two morphological targets, all ending with [s]. For the OME+ group, targets with final [s] posed greater difficulty than those with final [z], especially on morphophonological plural-{s) targets. The results suggested that the fluctuating hearing loss associated with OME might have a negative impact on speech perception.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational journal of language & communication disordersen_US
dc.rights© Royal College of Speech & Language Therapisen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectMorphophonological perceptionen_US
dc.subjectOtitis mediaen_US
dc.subjectPhonological perceptionen_US
dc.titleA preliminary account of phonological and morphophonological perception in young children with and without otitis mediaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationCity University of New Yorken_US
dc.collaborationAlbert Einstein College of Medicineen_US
dc.subject.categoryLanguages and Literatureen_US
dc.journalsHybrid Open Accessen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldHumanitiesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13682820117194en_US
dc.dept.handle123456789/54en
dc.relation.issue1en_US
dc.relation.volume31en_US
cut.common.academicyear2020-2021en_US
dc.identifier.spage21en_US
dc.identifier.epage42en_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1460-6984-
crisitem.journal.publisherWiley-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-6580-5190-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

36
checked on Nov 9, 2023

Page view(s) 50

354
Last Week
2
Last month
9
checked on May 13, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons