Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/30949
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorManganaris, George A.-
dc.contributor.authorMinas, Ioannis S.-
dc.contributor.authorCirilli, Marco-
dc.contributor.authorTorres, Rosario-
dc.contributor.authorBassi, Daniele-
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Guglielmo-
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-18T12:47:19Z-
dc.date.available2023-12-18T12:47:19Z-
dc.date.issued2022-11-17-
dc.identifier.citationScientia Horticulturae, 2022, vol. 305en_US
dc.identifier.issn3044238-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/30949-
dc.description.abstractPeach is the most important temperate fruit crop worldwide in terms of production after apple. However, a descending trend has been registered over the recent years in several key producing peach countries, mainly due to the increased labor cost and the reduced revenue for the farmer. The present perspective review aims to shed light on the current trends on peach fruit production related to cultivar and rootstock breeding initiatives, appropriate training system selection and targeted integrated management of main diseases, most promptly Monilinia spp. Cultivar breeding programs should focus on the most relevant outcomes about the main drivers of consumer's acceptance. In the near future, a contribution from the breeding sector should be expected in the reduction of the trade-off between quality and yield, towards selection of elite cultivars with enhanced aroma (a pool of compounds still scarcely known), with appreciable nutritional properties and extended market life. Such cultivars need an appropriate rootstock and canopy architecture to facilitate efficient cropping systems. The training/cropping system selection is of equal importance with rootstock selection as it can also determine efficiency and potential for mechanization. A tendency for the future is that several semi- and dwarfing Prunus hybrid rootstocks aligned with the innovations on peach tree architecture will lead to higher planting densities, reduced tree height and thus enhanced peach production with reduced labor cost. With the aim to advance peach fruit production and consumption, there is an urgent need to dissect solutions to valorize on the market the exceptional peach diversity and flavor potential, already present in the varietal landscape. The development of sophisticated non-destructive tools that will allow in cost-effective manner to determine fruit quality and maturity stage is expected to facilitate consumer eating experience and storage requirements with minimum risk of chilling injury symptoms development. Lastly, the phytosanitary protocol of small-sized wall-grown plants would most likely be more effective and would require reduced quantities of pesticides while simultaneously responding to the needs of a market that is increasingly attentive to fruit healthiness and environment protection. Phytosanitary issues can be addressed by controlling diseases and/or by improving genetic resistance.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofScientia Horticulturaeen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectBreedingen_US
dc.subjectChilling injuryen_US
dc.subjectCultivaren_US
dc.subjectDisease managementen_US
dc.subjectDry matter contenten_US
dc.subjectMonilinia spp.en_US
dc.subjectNon-destructiveen_US
dc.subjectPrunus persicaen_US
dc.subjectRootstocken_US
dc.subjectTraining systemen_US
dc.titlePeach for the future: A specialty crop revisiteden_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationColorado State Universityen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Milanen_US
dc.collaborationTecnològic Agroalimentari de Lleidaen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Bolognaen_US
dc.subject.categoryAgricultural Biotechnologyen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryUnited Statesen_US
dc.countryItalyen_US
dc.countrySpainen_US
dc.subject.fieldAgricultural Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scienta.2022.111390en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85135293800-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85135293800-
dc.relation.volume305en_US
cut.common.academicyear2021-2022en_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.journal.journalissn0304-4238-
crisitem.journal.publisherElsevier-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food Science-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-5849-6104-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

23
checked on Mar 14, 2024

Page view(s)

112
Last Week
3
Last month
11
checked on May 11, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons