Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/29953
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVasiliades, Michalis A.-
dc.contributor.authorHadjichambis, Andreas Ch.-
dc.contributor.authorParaskeva-Hadjichambi, Demetra-
dc.contributor.authorAdamou, Anastasia-
dc.contributor.authorGeorgiou, Yiannis-
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-24T09:17:04Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-24T09:17:04Z-
dc.date.issued2021-07-01-
dc.identifier.citationSustainability (Switzerland), vol. 13, iss. 13en_US
dc.identifier.issn20711050-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/29953-
dc.description.abstractIt is commonly argued that, despite the tremendous resonance Citizen Science (CS) has shown in recent years, there is still lack of understanding of important aspects defining citizens’ participation and engagement in CS initiatives. While CS initiatives could provide a vehicle to foster forms of participation contributing to the democratization of science, there is still limited attention paid to the “Citizen” component of the Citizen Science term. For the purpose of this work, we systematically reviewed the available literature for empirical studies in respect to citizens’ participation in environmental and nature-based CS initiatives established during the last two decades, using the PRISMA methodology. The participatory facet of the retrieved 119 CS initiatives was analysed on the basis of: (a) exclusion and inclusion demographic factors, (b) CS models and practices, (c) facil-itators and constraints of citizen’s participation, and (d) environmental citizenship. Our findings show that the majority of the CS initiatives did not place restrictions on gender participation; how-ever, we have identified that mostly highly educated adults participated in the reviewed initiatives. In addition, most of the CS initiatives reported in the literature were situated in the EU and USA, were mostly limited to the local scale, and primarily followed the contributory model. Academic institutions were found to coordinate the majority of the CS initiatives examined. By using digital technologies, academic scientists were able to control and increase data quality, as well as to engage a broader audience, even though they were mostly treating volunteers as “data collectors”, desiring their long-term engagement. Therefore, it will be of CS benefit to be better aligned with the mental-ity and needs of citizens. In this direction CS initiatives should trigger citizens’ learning gains and interpersonal/social benefits and personal, environmental, and social motivations, but also to shift their goals towards contributing to science and citizens’ connection with nature. On the other hand, there is a need to overcome any design and implementation barriers, and to enhance democratization through a more participative engagement of active and aware citizens, thus promoting environmental citizenship.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rights© by the authorsen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectConstraintsen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental citizen scienceen_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental citizenshipen_US
dc.subjectEx-clusionen_US
dc.subjectFacilitatorsen_US
dc.subjectInclusionen_US
dc.subjectModels and practicesen_US
dc.subjectNature-based citizen scienceen_US
dc.subjectParticipationen_US
dc.subjectSystematic literature reviewen_US
dc.titleA systematic literature review on the participation aspects of environmental and nature-based citizen science initiativesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus Centre for Environmental Research and Educationen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus Ministry of Education, Culture, Sport and Youthen_US
dc.subject.categoryMedia and Communicationsen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/su13137457en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85110076842-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85110076842-
dc.relation.issue13en_US
dc.relation.volume13en_US
cut.common.academicyearemptyen_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Communication and Internet Studies-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-2850-8848-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
sustainability-13-07457-v2.pdfFull text2.56 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

25
checked on Mar 14, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

12
Last Week
0
Last month
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

126
Last Week
1
Last month
11
checked on May 17, 2024

Download(s) 50

36
checked on May 17, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons