Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/29479
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPatsalidis, Stavros-
dc.contributor.authorAgapiou, Athos-
dc.contributor.authorHadjimitsis, Diofantos G.-
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-23T07:59:22Z-
dc.date.available2023-06-23T07:59:22Z-
dc.date.issued2019-06-17-
dc.identifier.citationAGILE, 2019, Limassol, Cyprusen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/29479-
dc.description.abstractSentinel-2 land monitoring constellation mission aims to generate products similar with the Landsat-8 images, the world’s longest continuously acquired collection of space-based land earth observation data. Though both sensors share similar spectral characteristics, their Relative Spectral Response Filters (RSRFs) are not identical. It is consequently important to assess whether and to what extent endproducts, such as land use maps, may vary between these two sensors. For this purpose, the random forest classifier was applied over a semi-arid environment in the Eastern Mediterranean (Cyprus). Initially the Sentinel-2 image was sampled to the Landsat-8 spatial resolution. Then, two different classification strategies have been followed: the first one using an equal (balance) training sample between the 11 land use classes, while the second classification was based on a random training sample. In addition, land use maps were also generated based on maximum likelihood, mahalanobis distance and minimum distance pixel-based supervised classification algorithms. The overall results were evaluated based on kappa, overall, producer’s and user’s accuracies. Random forest classification has provided the best results with a kappa accuracy of 90% for both datasets while maximum likelihood algorithm has provided a kappa coefficient between 79.06% and 81.27% for Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 sensors respectively. These results were much more improved compared to the mahalanobis and minimum distance classifiers, with an approximately kappa coefficient 69% and 66% respectively. In addition, the results obtained from the random forest have demonstrated that only a very small variance between the two datasets (Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8) exists (<3 % kappa coefficient), which can be due to the non-identical RSR filters of the sensor.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectLand use classificationen_US
dc.subjectRandom foresten_US
dc.subjectSentinel-2en_US
dc.subjectLandsat-8en_US
dc.subjectSemi-arid environmenten_US
dc.titleRandom forest classification analysis of Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 images over semi-arid environment in the Eastern Mediterraneanen_US
dc.typeConference Papersen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.subject.categoryEnvironmental Engineeringen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldEngineering and Technologyen_US
dc.identifier.urlhttps://agile-online.org/images/conferences/2019/documents/short_papers/105_Upload_your_PDF_file.pdfen
cut.common.academicyear2019-2020en_US
dc.identifier.external0jkdZSsAAAAJ:I8rxH6phXEkCen
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_c94f-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairetypeconferenceObject-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Civil Engineering and Geomatics-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Civil Engineering and Geomatics-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-9106-6766-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-2684-547X-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
Appears in Collections:Δημοσιεύσεις σε συνέδρια /Conference papers or poster or presentation
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat
105_Upload_your_PDF_file.pdf683.88 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

117
Last Week
0
Last month
10
checked on May 20, 2024

Download(s)

26
checked on May 20, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.