Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/22928
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAthinodorou, Filio-
dc.contributor.authorFoukas, Petros-
dc.contributor.authorTsaniklidis, Georgios-
dc.contributor.authorKotsiras, Anastasios-
dc.contributor.authorChrysargyris, Antonios-
dc.contributor.authorDelis, Costas-
dc.contributor.authorKyratzis, Angelos C.-
dc.contributor.authorTzortzakis, Nikos G.-
dc.contributor.authorNikoloudakis, Nikolaos-
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-30T11:41:07Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-30T11:41:07Z-
dc.date.issued2021-08-18-
dc.identifier.citationPlants, 2021, vol. 10, no. 8, articl. no. 1698en_US
dc.identifier.issn22237747-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/22928-
dc.description.abstractTomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) is considered one of the most valuable and versatile vegetable crops globally and also serves as a significant model species for fruit developmental biology. Despite its significance, a severe genetic bottleneck and intense selection of genotypes with specific qualitative traits have resulted in the prevalence of a restricted number of (geno)types, also causing a lack of diversity across widespread cultivated types. As a result, the re-emergence of landraces as well as traditional and heirloom varieties is largely acknowledged as a countermeasure to restore phenotypic, phytochemical and genetic diversity while enriching the aroma/taste tomato palette. On those grounds, the Cypriot tomato germplasm was assessed and characterized. Ten landrace accessions were evaluated under greenhouse conditions and data were collected for 24 IPGRI discrete phenotypic traits. Grouping of accessions largely reflected the fruit shape and size; four different fruit types were recorded across accessions (flattened, heart-shaped, rounded and highly rounded). Moreover, a single run panel consisting of ten SSRs was developed and applied in order to genetically characterize 190 Cypriot genotypes and foreign heirloom varieties. Based on genetic indexes it was established that tomato landraces have a rather low level of heterogeneity and genetic variation. Finally, mineral and phytochemical analyses were conducted in order to estimate biochemical attributes (total phenolics, ascorbic acid, lycopene, β-carotene, total soluble content, titratable acidity) across genotypes; thus, ascertaining that the Cypriot panel has a high nutritional value. Due to the thermo-drought adaptation and tolerance of these genotypes, the current study serves as a roadmap for future breeding efforts in order to incorporate desirable traits or develop novel tomato lines combining resilience and alimentary value.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPlantsen_US
dc.rights© 2021 by the authors. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectSolanum lycopersiconen_US
dc.subjectAscorbic aciden_US
dc.subjectCarotenoidsen_US
dc.subjectHeirloom varietiesen_US
dc.subjectLandracesen_US
dc.subjectMicrosatellitesen_US
dc.subjectMineralsen_US
dc.subjectPhenolicsen_US
dc.titleMorphological Diversity, Genetic Characterization, and Phytochemical Assessment of the Cypriot Tomato Germplasmen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationHellenic Agricultural Organization “Demeter”en_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Peloponneseen_US
dc.collaborationMinistry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment, Cyprusen_US
dc.subject.categoryAgriculture Forestry and Fisheriesen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryGreeceen_US
dc.subject.fieldAgricultural Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/plants10081698en_US
dc.identifier.pmid34451743-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85112764154-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85112764154-
dc.relation.issue8en_US
dc.relation.volume10en_US
cut.common.academicyear2020-2021en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.journal.journalissn2223-7747-
crisitem.journal.publisherMDPI-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food Science-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food Science-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food Science-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-1067-7977-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-2719-6627-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-3935-8443-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
plants-10-01698-v2.pdfFulltext4.12 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

13
checked on Feb 2, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

10
Last Week
0
Last month
1
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

264
Last Week
2
Last month
11
checked on May 11, 2024

Download(s)

152
checked on May 11, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons