Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/22863
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGohari, Gholamreza-
dc.contributor.authorPanahirad, Sima-
dc.contributor.authorSepehri, Nasrin-
dc.contributor.authorAkbari, Ali-
dc.contributor.authorZahedi, Seyed Morteza-
dc.contributor.authorJafari, Hessam-
dc.contributor.authorDadpour, Mohammad Reza-
dc.contributor.authorFotopoulos, Vasileios-
dc.date.accessioned2021-08-24T09:58:44Z-
dc.date.available2021-08-24T09:58:44Z-
dc.date.issued2021-08-
dc.identifier.citationEnvironmental Science and Pollution Research volume, 2021, vol. 28, no. 31, pp. 42877–42890en_US
dc.identifier.issn16147499-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/22863-
dc.description.abstractSalinity has destructive impacts in plant production; therefore, application of new approaches such as nanotechnology and plant priming is attracting increasing attention as an innovative means to ameliorate salt stress effects. Considering the unique properties and recorded beneficial influence of carbon quantum dots (CQDs) and proline in plant growth and physiological parameters when applied individually, their conjugation in the form of carbon quantum dot nanoparticles functionalized by proline (Pro-CQDs NPs) could lead to synergistic effects. Accordingly, an experiment was conducted to evaluate the impact of this advanced nanomaterial (Pro-CQDs NPs) as a chemical priming agent, in grapevine plants cv. 'Rasha'. For this purpose, proline, CQDs, and Pro-CQDs NPs at three concentrations (0, 50, and 100 mg L-1) were applied exogenously 48 h prior to salinity stress (0 and 100 mM NaCl) that was imposed for a month. Three days after imposing salt stress, an array of biochemical measurements was recorded, while agronomic and some physiological parameters were noted at the end of the stress period. Results revealed that proline treatment at both concentrations, as well as CQDs and Pro-CQDs NPs at low concentration, positively affected grapevine plants under both non-stress and stress conditions. Specifically, the application of proline at 100 mg L-1 and Pro-CQDs NPs at 50 mg L-1 resulted in optimal performance identifying 50 mg L-1 Pro-CQDs NPs as the optimal treatment. Proline treatment at 100 mg L-1 increased leaf fresh weight (FW) and dry weight (DW); chl a, b, and proline content; SOD activity under both non-stress and stress conditions; Y (II) under salinity and carotenoid content; and CAT activity under control conditions. Pro-CQDs NP treatment at 50 mg L-1 enhanced total phenol, anthocyanin, and Fv/Fo, as well as APX and GP activities under both conditions, while increasing carotenoid, Y (II), Fv/Fo, and CAT activity under salinity. Furthermore, it decreased MDA and H2O2 contents at both conditions and EL and Y (NO) under salt stress. Overall, conjugation of CQDs with proline at 50 mg L-1 resulted in further improving the protective effect of proline application at 100 mg L-1. Therefore, functionalization of NPs with chemical priming agents appears to be an effective means of optimizing plant-priming approaches towards efficient amelioration of abiotic stress-related damage in plants.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEnvironmental Science and Pollution Researchen_US
dc.rights© The Author(s)en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectAbiotic stressen_US
dc.subjectAntioxidantsen_US
dc.subjectChemical primingen_US
dc.subjectGrapevineen_US
dc.subjectNanoparticlesen_US
dc.titleEnhanced tolerance to salinity stress in grapevine plants through application of carbon quantum dots functionalized by prolineen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Maraghehen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Tabrizen_US
dc.collaborationUrmia University of Medical Sciencesen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.subject.categoryAgriculture Forestry and Fisheriesen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryIranen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldAgricultural Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11356-021-13794-wen_US
dc.identifier.pmid33829379-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85103901364-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85103901364-
dc.relation.issue31en_US
dc.relation.volume28en_US
cut.common.academicyearemptyen_US
dc.identifier.spage42877en_US
dc.identifier.epage42890en_US
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food Science-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-1205-2070-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1614-7499-
crisitem.journal.publisherSpringer Nature-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Gohari2021_Article_EnhancedToleranceToSalinityStr.pdf4.29 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

33
checked on Feb 2, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

19
Last Week
0
Last month
2
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

253
Last Week
3
Last month
9
checked on May 25, 2024

Download(s)

686
checked on May 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons