Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/22754
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVink, Stefanie N.-
dc.contributor.authorChrysargyris, Antonios-
dc.contributor.authorTzortzakis, Nikos G.-
dc.contributor.authorSalles, Joana Falcão-
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-22T10:22:34Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-22T10:22:34Z-
dc.date.issued2021-02-01-
dc.identifier.citationApplied Soil Ecology, 2021, vol. 158, articl. no. 103807en_US
dc.identifier.issn09291393-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/22754-
dc.description.abstractPlant-associated bacterial communities are important contributors towards plant health and productivity, and are increasingly acknowledged for having the potential to alter plants' response to climate extremes, such as drought. Viticulture is generally conducted in areas that are prone to seasonal water deficit, and irrigation is the common way to counter this. In addition, soil conservation measures, such as cover cropping and no-tillage, are increasingly used. However, the effect of these management practices, in particular in viticulture, on soil bacterial communities remains unclear. Therefore, the objective was to examine the effect of irrigation and tillage on shaping soil bacterial communities associated with different grapevine cultivars, at different plant phenological stages. We conducted an experiment whereby we examined the soil bacterial community of three Vitis vinifera L. (grapevine) cultivars (two indigenous and one international, grown at different locations in the same vineyard) under different management practices (irrigated and non-irrigated, tillage and no-tillage). Since there is evidence that plant phenology can also affect soil microbial communities, we sampled soil at three different plant developmental stages (flowering, veraison and harvest). Soil bacterial communities primarily correlated with cultivar and location. At harvest we observed a link between bacterial communities and grape quality and yield measures and at all stages with soil physicochemical properties. A number of taxa were enriched in one or two cultivars, but these were generally in low abundance in our dataset. We also found an effect of plant phenology and management practices within each cultivar. For the two indigenous cultivars, soil bacterial communities at the flowering stage were most distinct, while for the international cultivar it was at the veraison stage. However, for all three cultivars, this effect differed by tillage treatment: bacterial communities in the tillage treatment varied by plant phenology, but in the no-tillage treatment less difference was observed, suggesting a buffering effect. While irrigation did lead to changes in bacterial communities, the effect was not as strong as that of the other factors. Our results show that soil bacterial communities in grapevines are shaped by both plant-associated effects (i.e. cultivar and plant phenological stage) and environmental variables (i.e. soil management and soil physicochemical properties), and importantly, that these factors have an interactive effect. Future research on soil bacterial communities in grapevines should take this variability into account, as well as focusing on its functional implications.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Soil Ecologyen_US
dc.rights© The Authors.en_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectBacterial turnoveren_US
dc.subjectCultivaren_US
dc.subjectMicrobial communityen_US
dc.subjectIrrigationen_US
dc.subjectTillageen_US
dc.subjectViticultureen_US
dc.titleBacterial community dynamics varies with soil management and irrigation practices in grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.)en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Groningenen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.subject.categoryAgriculture Forestry and Fisheriesen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryNetherlandsen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldAgricultural Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.apsoil.2020.103807en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85094844728-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85094844728-
dc.relation.volume158en_US
cut.common.academicyear2020-2021en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.journal.journalissn0929-1393-
crisitem.journal.publisherElsevier-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food Science-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food Science-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-1067-7977-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-2719-6627-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
1-s2.0-S0929139320307368-main.pdfFulltext4.98 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

12
checked on Mar 14, 2024

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

10
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

274
Last Week
1
Last month
9
checked on May 13, 2024

Download(s)

172
checked on May 13, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons