Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/19156
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPapastavrou, Evridiki-
dc.contributor.authorIgoumenidis, Michael-
dc.contributor.authorLemonidou, Chryssoula-
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-14T10:15:45Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-14T10:15:45Z-
dc.date.issued2020-01-
dc.identifier.citationNursing Philosophy, 2020, vol. 21, no. 1, sp. iss., articl. no. e12284en_US
dc.identifier.issn1466769X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/19156-
dc.description.abstractThe concept of equality is subject to many different interpretations, and it is closely connected to similar concepts such as equity, justice, fairness, and human rights. As an ideal, equality entails many aspects that are untenable. For instance, genetic and social inequalities may never be extinct, but they can both be ameliorated by proper distribution of society's resources. Likewise, within the context of health care, equality can be promoted by proper rationing of health resources, amongst which nursing care stands out. In the field of nursing, the principle of equality presents itself in various forms of ethical and deontological mandates. However, beyond good intentions and abstract notions, there is a need to examine the ways in which nurses enforce this principle in practice, within the reality of modern health systems. Although there is scarcity of qualitative evidence in the nursing care rationing literature, existing studies suggest that fair treatment pertains to a largely intuitive sense of equality which involves subjective perceptions and judgements about rationing. Nurses' initial predisposition is to view all patients as equal and treat them in an equal manner; yet, on an individual basis, each patient has a different starting point, different needs and different prospects that render rationing decisions complex and uncertain. Equality should be accepted with its unavoidable limitations in practice and be further examined within the context of nursing care rationing, in the hope that it can be advanced in a consistent way, despite the idealistic nature in many of its aspects.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofNursing Philosophyen_US
dc.rights© Wileyen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectEqualityen_US
dc.subjectEquityen_US
dc.subjectInequalityen_US
dc.subjectNursing care rationingen_US
dc.subjectResource allocationen_US
dc.titleEquality as an ethical concept within the context of nursing care rationingen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Patrasen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationNational and Kapodistrian University of Athensen_US
dc.subject.categoryHealth Sciencesen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryGreeceen_US
dc.subject.fieldMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/nup.12284en_US
dc.relation.issue1, sp. iss.en_US
dc.relation.volume21en_US
cut.common.academicyear2019-2020en_US
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Nursing-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-5128-3651-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1466-769X-
crisitem.journal.publisherWiley-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

7
checked on Nov 6, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

1
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 27, 2023

Page view(s)

235
Last Week
0
Last month
8
checked on May 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons