Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/19038
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorPirela, Sandra Vanessa-
dc.contributor.authorBhattacharya, Kunal-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Yun-
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Yipei-
dc.contributor.authorWang, Guanghe-
dc.contributor.authorChristophi, Costas A.-
dc.contributor.authorGodleski, John J.-
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Treye A.-
dc.contributor.authorQian, Yong-
dc.contributor.authorOrandle, Marlene S.-
dc.contributor.authorSisler, Jennifer D.-
dc.contributor.authorBello, Dhimiter-
dc.contributor.authorCastranova, Vincent C.-
dc.contributor.authorDemokritou, Philip-
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-21T07:07:09Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-21T07:07:09Z-
dc.date.issued2019-03-
dc.identifier.citationNanoImpact, 2019, vol. 15, articl. no. 100176en_US
dc.identifier.issn24520748-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/19038-
dc.description.abstractEngineered nanomaterials (ENMs) used in toners to improve their performance are released in the air during laser printer use. ENMs play an important catalytic role in the breakdown of the toner polymer and subsequent rearrangement of organic compounds as well as in the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Cellular, animal, and human occupational exposure studies have shown that such printer-emitted particles (PEPs) induce inflammation, systemic oxidative stress, and genotoxicity, as well as, increase frequency of coughing, wheezing, and upper airway symptoms, raising concerns about their long-term impact on human health. No safety thresholds or regulatory guidelines currently exist for PEPs. In this study, Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed (by whole-body inhalation) to PEPs 5 h/day for up to 21 days using an exposure platform previously developed by the authors. The control group comprised of an equal number of rats exposed to high-efficiency particulate air (HEPA) filtered air. The PEPs had a mean particle diameter of approximately 45 nm, and a total particle number concentration ranging from 4 to 21 × 105 #/cm3. The maximum total volatile organic compound (tVOCs) concentration was 363.2 ± 162 ppb. The Multiple-Path Particle Dosimetry Model (MPPD) estimated the deposited fraction of PEPs to be around 7, 6 and 21% in the head, tracheobronchial (TB) and alveolar regions, respectively. Analysis of biochemical markers in the nasal and bronchoalveolar lavage fluids (NLF, BALF) of PEPs-exposed animals showed only mild oxidative stress and inflammation. No damage was detected in the histological and chemiluminescence analysis of lung and heart tissues of PEPs-exposed animals. Pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, such as Interleukin (IL) 1β, IL-12, IL-18, MIP-1α, MIP-2, GRO/KC, and Fractalkine were found to be up-/down-regulated in NLF and BALF of the PEPs-exposed animals. Also, serum biomarkers of oxidative stress and inflammation, such as 8-isoprostane, 4-hydroxynonemal, and Leukotriene B4 were elevated in PEPs-exposed animals. In conclusion, following exposure to PEPs, there was modest lung injury and inflammation in the respiratory tract. Specifically, changes in expression of certain cytokines and chemokines, along with serum levels of 8-isoprostane, were the most significant adverse effects reported following exposure to PEPs.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofNanoImpacten_US
dc.rights© Elsevieren_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectLaser printer emissionsen_US
dc.subjectEngineered nanoparticlesen_US
dc.subjectLungen_US
dc.subjectInflammationen_US
dc.subjectOxidative stressen_US
dc.subjectExposure biologyen_US
dc.titleA 21-day sub-acute, whole-body inhalation exposure to printer-emitted engineered nanoparticles in rats: Exploring pulmonary and systemic effectsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationHarvard Universityen_US
dc.collaborationPeking Universityen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationU.S. Consumer Product Safety Commissionen_US
dc.collaborationNational Institute for Occupational Safety and Healthen_US
dc.collaborationWest Virginia Universityen_US
dc.subject.categoryClinical Medicineen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryUnited Statesen_US
dc.countryChinaen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldMedical and Health Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.impact.2019.100176en_US
dc.relation.volume15en_US
cut.common.academicyear2018-2019en_US
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.journal.journalissn2452-0748-
crisitem.journal.publisherElsevier-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Health Sciences-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-0503-1538-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Health Sciences-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

18
checked on Nov 6, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

18
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s) 50

380
Last Week
9
Last month
9
checked on May 9, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons