Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/1779
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKyriakides, Christopher-
dc.date.accessioned2013-02-05T17:19:05Zen
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-16T13:11:24Z-
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-02T09:45:33Z-
dc.date.available2013-02-05T17:19:05Zen
dc.date.available2013-05-16T13:11:24Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-02T09:45:33Z-
dc.date.issued2008-01-28-
dc.identifier.citationEthnic and Racial Studies, 2008, vol. 31, iss. 3, pp. 592-610en_US
dc.identifier.issn14664356-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/1779-
dc.description.abstractRecent debate surrounding racism and immigration in the UK reveals that anti-racist policy is being constructed within a 'Third Way' political agenda such that the definition of racism comes to signify a phenomenon considered detrimental to the 'building of community'. Given the controversial role of the British state in perpetuating the 'immigration/ race-relations problematic', this paper argues that New Labour's approach to racism comes to embody a set of contradictory assumptions fostered in previous administrations while incorporating elements significant to 'Third Way' governance. Crucial to current policy prescription is the reconstitution of the subject of racism, such that both perpetrator and target are viewed through the policy lens of emotional governance. In short, the contemporary anti-racist state seeks to foster legitimacy via an appeal to an emotionalized subjective condition, so that policy defines racism according to the needs of state. Consequently, current 'race-relations' policy is an intervention which redefines racist causation while reinforcing state authority.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofEthnic and Racial Studiesen_US
dc.rights© Taylor & Francisen_US
dc.subjectRacismen_US
dc.subjectAnti-racismen_US
dc.subjectStateen_US
dc.subjectEuropeen_US
dc.subjectRaceen_US
dc.titleThird way anti-racism: a contextual constructionist approachen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen
dc.collaborationNew York Universityen_US
dc.subject.categoryOther Social Sciencesen_US
dc.journalsSubscriptionen_US
dc.countryUnited States of Americaen_US
dc.subject.fieldSocial Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/01419870701568825en_US
dc.dept.handle123456789/54en
dc.relation.issue3en_US
dc.relation.volume31en_US
cut.common.academicyear2007-2008en_US
dc.identifier.spage592en_US
dc.identifier.epage610en_US
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Communication and Internet Studies-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Communication and Media Studies-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1466-4356-
crisitem.journal.publisherTaylor & Francis-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

13
checked on Nov 9, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations

13
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s)

485
Last Week
0
Last month
13
checked on May 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.