Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/14281
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAgrafiotis, Panagiotis-
dc.contributor.authorGeorgopoulos, Andreas-
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-03T10:01:57Z-
dc.date.available2019-07-03T10:01:57Z-
dc.date.issued2015-01-01-
dc.identifier.citation2015 Underwater 3D Recording and Modeling, Piano di Sorrento, Italy, 16 April 2015 through 17 April 2015en_US
dc.identifier.issn16821750-
dc.identifier.issn2-s2.0-84927937309-
dc.identifier.issnhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84927937309-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/14281-
dc.descriptionInternational Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences - ISPRS Archives, Volume 40, Issue 5W5, 9 April 2015, Pages 1-6en_US
dc.description.abstractRefraction is the main cause of geometric distortions in the case of two media photogrammetry. However, this effect cannot be compensated and corrected by a suitable camera calibration procedure (Georgopoulos and Agrafiotis, 2012). In addition, according to the literature (Lavest et al. 2000), when the camera is underwater, the effective focal length is approximately equal to that in the air multiplied by the refractive index of water. This ratio depends on the composition of the water (salinity, temperature, etc.) and usually ranges from 1.10 to 1.34. It seems, that in two media photogrammetry, the 1.33 factor used for clean water in underwater cases does not apply and the most probable relation of the effective camera constant to the one in air is depending of the percentages of air and water within the total camera-to-object distance. This paper examines this relation in detail, verifies it and develops it through the application of calibration methods using different test fields. In addition the current methodologies for underwater and two-media calibration are mentioned and the problem of two-media calibration is described and analysed.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subjectCalibrationen_US
dc.subjectCamera constanten_US
dc.subjectRefractionen_US
dc.subjectTwo media photogrammetryen_US
dc.titleCamera constant in the case of two media photogrammetryen_US
dc.typeConference Papersen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationNational Technical University Of Athensen_US
dc.subject.categoryCivil Engineeringen_US
dc.countryGreeceen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldEngineering and Technologyen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.relation.conferenceUnderwater 3D Recording and Modellingen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-5-W5-1-2015en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84927937309-
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84927937309-
cut.common.academicyear2014-2015en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_c94f-
item.openairetypeconferenceObject-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Civil Engineering and Geomatics-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0003-4474-5007-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
Appears in Collections:Δημοσιεύσεις σε συνέδρια /Conference papers or poster or presentation
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
camera constant.pdfOpen Access1.11 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 5

23
checked on Mar 14, 2024

Page view(s) 5

389
Last Week
4
Last month
13
checked on May 14, 2024

Download(s) 20

121
checked on May 14, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.