Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/14165
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSkarlatos, Dimitrios-
dc.contributor.authorKiparissi, Stavroula-
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-28T08:52:16Z-
dc.date.available2019-06-28T08:52:16Z-
dc.date.issued2012-07-13-
dc.identifier.citation22nd Congress of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing: Imaging a Sustainable Future, ISPRS 2012, Melbourne Convention and Exhibition CentreMelbourne, Australia, 25 August 2012 through 1 September 2012en_US
dc.descriptionISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Volume 1, 13 July 2012, Pages 299-304en_US
dc.description.abstractThe merging of photogrammetry and computer vision has raised discussions regarding its ability to produce very dense point clouds, comparable, under circumstances to terrestrial laser scanning (TLS). This paper approaches this issue in terms of accuracy, density, methodology and ease to use. Three tests have been conducted to evaluate the process as well as data density, quality, registration and methodology. At the first test a 300 mm sphere with texture has been used as a reference object is order to address data quality using image based techniques. Menci's Zscan was tested against the Bundler-PMVS work flow. The second test is a flat building facade, where Zscan, TLS and Bundler-PMVS are compared directly. The last test was contacted in an electricity power station which was an extremely complex structure. Two TLS stations were compared against 212 Bundler-PMVS photos. Quantitative comparisons based on several criteria are presented. For small and medium size objects and distances Bundler-PMVS seems to have an advantage in terms of methodology and accuracy. In large scale objects TLS is better in terms of quality and processing time.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.subject3D reconstructionen_US
dc.subjectaccuracyen_US
dc.subjectComparisonen_US
dc.subjectImage based modellingen_US
dc.subjectLaser scanningen_US
dc.subjectopen sourceen_US
dc.titleComparison of laser scanning, photogrammetry and SFM-MVS pipeline applied in structures and artificial surfacesen_US
dc.typeConference Papersen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.subject.categoryCivil Engineeringen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.subject.fieldEngineering and Technologyen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.relation.conferenceInternational Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing Congressen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5194/isprsannals-I-3-299-2012en_US
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85032616076-
cut.common.academicyear2011-2012en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_c94f-
item.openairetypeconferenceObject-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Civil Engineering and Geomatics-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-2732-4780-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-0587-8889-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
Appears in Collections:Δημοσιεύσεις σε συνέδρια /Conference papers or poster or presentation
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
isprsannals-I-3-299-2012.pdf814.91 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

61
checked on Nov 6, 2023

Page view(s)

1,084
Last Week
7
Last month
28
checked on May 18, 2024

Download(s) 5

917
checked on May 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.