Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/1115
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorForster, Helga-
dc.contributor.authorJones, Carol-
dc.contributor.authorKanetis, Loukas-
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-10T10:16:58Zen
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-16T06:24:59Z-
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-02T08:49:49Z-
dc.date.available2013-01-10T10:16:58Zen
dc.date.available2013-05-16T06:24:59Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-02T08:49:49Z-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.identifier.citationPhytopathology, 2008, vol. 98, iss. 2, pp. 205-214en_US
dc.identifier.issn0031949X-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/1115-
dc.description.abstractGenetic and biochemical mechanisms of fludioxonil and pyrimethanil resistance in isolates of Penicillium digitatum were evaluated and compared to those characterized in other fungi. Resistant isolates were naturally occurring in packinghouses and were not associated with crop losses. For the phenylpyrrole fludioxonil, EC 50 values were 0.02 to 0.04 μg/ml for sensitive, 0.08 to 0.65 μg/ml for moderately resistant (MR), and >40 μg/ml for highly resistant (HR) isolates. Two fludioxonil-sensitive isolates evaluated were also significantly more sensitive to the unrelated dicarboximide fungicide iprodione, that also disrupts osmotic regulation, than the MR and HR isolates. There was no consistent relationship, however, between the HR and MR isolates and their sensitivity to iprodione or osmotic stress. Although, two nucleotide substitutions were found in a sequence analysis of the N-terminal amino acid repeat region of the os-1-related histidine kinase gene among isolates of P. digitatum, these were not correlated with fludioxonil resistance. In mycelia not exposed to fludioxonil, the amount of phosphorylated OS-2-related protein (PdOS-2) was higher in fludioxonil-sensitive isolates and lowest in the HR isolate. An increase in PdOS-2 was observed for sensitive and resistant isolates after exposure to fludioxonil. In addition, glycerol content in untreated mycelia of the fludioxonil-sensitive isolate was significantly higher than in resistant isolates. After exposure to fludioxonil, glycerol concentrations significantly increased in the sensitive and MR isolates, but not in the HR isolate. Thus, our studies indicate that the mode of action of fludioxonil in P. digitatum is probably the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway that stimulates glycerol synthesis in sensitive and MR isolates. The general suppression of this pathway in resistant isolates was supported by the fact that growth and sporulation of MR and HR isolates were significantly reduced from that of sensitive isolates. In studies on the mode of action of anilinopyrimidines (AP), EC50 values for mycelial growth of P. digitatum and the previously characterized Botrytis cinerea were determined for cyprodinil and pyrimethanil using a defined culture medium without and with the addition of selected amino acids and homocysteine. The addition of amino acids resulted in a reduced toxicity of the two AP fungicides in both fungi, but the effect of each additive was significantly lower for P. digitatum than for B. cinerea. This suggests that methionine biosynthesis is not the primary target site of APs in P. digitatumen_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofPhytopathologyen_US
dc.rights© The American Phytopathological Societyen_US
dc.subjectCitrusen_US
dc.subjectFungicide resistanceen_US
dc.subjectFungal proteinsen_US
dc.subjectPyrrolesen_US
dc.subjectAmino acid sequenceen_US
dc.subjectPlant diseasesen_US
dc.subjectPyrimidinesen_US
dc.titleCharacterization of genetic and biochemical mechanisms of fludioxonil and pyrimethanil resistance in field isolates of Penicillium digitatumen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.affiliationUniversity of Californiaen
dc.collaborationUniversity of Californiaen_US
dc.subject.categoryAgricultural Biotechnologyen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryUnited Statesen_US
dc.subject.fieldAgricultural Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1094/PHYTO-98-2-0205en_US
dc.dept.handle123456789/54en
dc.relation.issue2en_US
dc.relation.volume98en_US
cut.common.academicyear2008-2009en_US
dc.identifier.spage205en_US
dc.identifier.epage214en_US
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.languageiso639-1en-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Agricultural Sciences, Biotechnology and Food Science-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-1869-558X-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Geotechnical Sciences and Environmental Management-
crisitem.journal.journalissn1943-7684-
crisitem.journal.publisherAmerican Phytopathological Society-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

74
checked on Nov 9, 2023

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 20

67
Last Week
0
Last month
1
checked on Oct 29, 2023

Page view(s) 20

467
Last Week
1
Last month
15
checked on May 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.