Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/10542
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAgapiou, Athos-
dc.contributor.authorLysandrou, Vasiliki-
dc.contributor.authorSarris, Apostolos-
dc.contributor.authorPapadopoulos, Nikos-
dc.contributor.authorHadjimitsis, Diofantos G.-
dc.date.accessioned2017-11-21T08:18:49Z-
dc.date.available2017-11-21T08:18:49Z-
dc.date.issued2017-06-01-
dc.identifier.citationGeosciences (Switzerland), 2017, vol. 7, no. 2en_US
dc.identifier.issn20763263-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/10542-
dc.description.abstractThe paper investigates the superficial layers of an archaeological landscape based on the integration of various remote sensing techniques. It is well known in the literature that shallow depths may be rich in archeological remains, which generate different signal responses depending on the applied technique. In this study three main technologies are examined, namely ground-penetrating radar (GPR), ground spectroscopy, and multispectral satellite imagery. The study aims to propose a methodology to enhance optical remote sensing satellite images, intended for archaeological research, based on the integration of ground based and satellite datasets. For this task, a regression model between the ground spectroradiometer and GPR is established which is then projected to a high resolution sub-meter optical image. The overall methodology consists of nine steps. Beyond the acquirement of the in-situ measurements and their calibration (Steps 1–3), various regression models are examined for more than 70 different vegetation indices (Steps 4–5). The specific data analysis indicated that the red-edge position (REP) hyperspectral index was the most appropriate for developing a local fusion model between ground spectroscopy data and GPR datasets (Step 6), providing comparable results with the in situ GPR measurements (Step 7). Other vegetation indices, such as the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), have also been examined, providing significant correlation between the two datasets (R = 0.50). The model is then projected to a high-resolution image over the area of interest (Step 8). The proposed methodology was evaluated with a series of field data collected from the Vésztő-Mágor Tell in the eastern part of Hungary. The results were compared with in situ magnetic gradiometry measurements, indicating common interpretation results. The results were also compatible with the preliminary archaeological investigations of the area (Step 9). The overall outcomes document that fusion models between various types of remote sensing datasets frequently used to support archaeological research can further expand the current capabilities and applications for the detection of buried archaeological remains.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relationATHENA. Remote Sensing Science Center for Cultural Heritageen_US
dc.relation.ispartofGeosciencesen_US
dc.rights© by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attributionen_US
dc.subjectEnhancementen_US
dc.subjectFusionen_US
dc.subjectGround spectroscopyen_US
dc.subjectGround-penetrating radar (GPR)en_US
dc.subjectGeoEyeen_US
dc.subjectGeophysicsen_US
dc.subjectRemote sensing archaeologyen_US
dc.titleFusion of satellite multispectral images based on ground-penetrating radar (GPR) data for the investigation of buried concealed archaeological remainsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationFoundation for Research & Technology-Hellas (F.O.R.T.H.)en_US
dc.subject.categoryEarth and Related Environmental Sciencesen_US
dc.journalsOpen Accessen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryGreeceen_US
dc.subject.fieldNatural Sciencesen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/geosciences7020040en_US
dc.relation.issue2en_US
dc.relation.volume7en_US
cut.common.academicyear2016-2017en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501-
item.openairetypearticle-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.journal.journalissn2076-3263-
crisitem.journal.publisherMDPI-
crisitem.project.grantnoH2020-TWINN-2015-CSA-
crisitem.project.fundingProgramH2020 Twinning-
crisitem.project.openAireinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/691936-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Civil Engineering and Geomatics-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Civil Engineering and Geomatics-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Civil Engineering and Geomatics-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-9106-6766-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-1448-7599-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-2684-547X-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
geosciences-07-00040.pdf19.35 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

27
checked on Nov 9, 2023

Page view(s)

483
Last Week
1
Last month
11
checked on May 14, 2024

Download(s) 20

155
checked on May 14, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.