Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/10015
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRössler, Ole-
dc.contributor.authorBenestad, Rasmus E.-
dc.contributor.authorVlachogannis, Diamando-
dc.contributor.authorHeike, Hübener-
dc.contributor.authorKanamaru, Hideki-
dc.contributor.authorPagé, Christian-
dc.contributor.authorCardoso, Rita M.-
dc.contributor.authorSoares, Pedro-
dc.contributor.authorMaraun, Douglas-
dc.contributor.authorKreienkamp, Frank-
dc.contributor.authorChristodoulides, Paul-
dc.contributor.authorFischer, Andreas-
dc.contributor.authorSzabo, Peter-
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-06T08:31:35Z-
dc.date.available2017-03-06T08:31:35Z-
dc.date.issued2016-04-
dc.identifier.citationEGU General Assembly, 2016, 17-22 April 2016, Vienna Austriaen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14279/10015-
dc.description.abstractAt the climate downscaling interface, numerous downscaling techniques and different philosophies compete on being the best method in their specific terms. Thereby, it remains unclear to what extent and for which purpose these downscaling techniques are valid or even the most appropriate choice. A common validation framework that compares all the different available methods was missing so far. The initiative VALUE closes this gap with such a common validation framework. An essential part of a validation framework for downscaling techniques is the definition of appropriate validation measures. The selection of validation measures should consider the needs of the stakeholder: some might need a temporal or spatial average of a certain variable, others might need temporal or spatial distributions of some variables, still others might need extremes for the variables of interest or even inter-variable dependencies. Hence, a close interaction of climate data providers and climate data users is necessary. Thus, the challenge in formulating a common validation framework mirrors also the challenges between the climate data providers and the impact assessment community. This poster elaborates the issues and challenges at the downscaling interface as it is seen within the VALUE community. It suggests three different actor groups: one group consisting of the climate data providers, the other two groups being climate data users (impact modellers and societal users). Hence, the downscaling interface faces classical transdisciplinary challenges. We depict a graphical illustration of actors involved and their interactions. In addition, we identified four different types of issues that need to be considered: i.e. data based, knowledge based, communication based, and structural issues. They all may, individually or jointly, hinder an optimal exchange of data and information between the actor groups at the downscaling interface. Finally, some possible ways to tackle these issues are discussed.en_US
dc.formatpdfen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rights© Author(s) 2016. CC Attribution 3.0 License.en_US
dc.subjectClimate data providersen_US
dc.subjectClimate data usersen_US
dc.subjectClimate downscaling interfacecen_US
dc.titleActor groups, related needs, and challenges at the climate downscaling interfaceen_US
dc.typeConference Papersen_US
dc.collaborationInstitute for Geographyen_US
dc.collaborationThe Norwegian Meteorological Instituteen_US
dc.collaborationEnvironmental Radioactivity Laboratory Inrastes, NCSR "Demokritos”en_US
dc.collaborationHessian Agency for Nature Conservationen_US
dc.collaborationFood and Agriculture Organization of the United Nationsen_US
dc.collaborationUniversity of Lisbonen_US
dc.collaborationWegener Center for Climate and Global Changeen_US
dc.collaborationDeutscher Wetterdiensten_US
dc.collaborationCyprus University of Technologyen_US
dc.collaborationFederal Office of Meteorology and Climatology MeteoSwissen_US
dc.collaborationHungarian Meteorological Serviceen_US
dc.subject.categoryElectrical Engineering - Electronic Engineering - Information Engineeringen_US
dc.countrySwitzerlanden_US
dc.countryGreeceen_US
dc.countryGermanyen_US
dc.countryItalyen_US
dc.countryFranceen_US
dc.countryPortugalen_US
dc.countryAustriaen_US
dc.countryCyprusen_US
dc.countryHungaryen_US
dc.subject.fieldEngineering and Technologyen_US
dc.publicationPeer Revieweden_US
dc.relation.conferenceEGU General Assemblyen_US
cut.common.academicyear2015-2016en_US
item.fulltextWith Fulltext-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.grantfulltextopen-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_c94f-
item.openairetypeconferenceObject-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.deptDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Computer Engineering and Informatics-
crisitem.author.facultyFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-2229-8798-
crisitem.author.parentorgFaculty of Engineering and Technology-
Appears in Collections:Δημοσιεύσεις σε συνέδρια /Conference papers or poster or presentation
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Paul Christodoulides.pdf© Author(s) 2016. CC Attribution 3.0 License.35.64 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
CORE Recommender
Show simple item record

Page view(s) 50

505
Last Week
2
Last month
10
checked on May 12, 2024

Download(s) 50

99
checked on May 12, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in KTISIS are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.