Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Predicting cardiometabolic risk: Waist-to-height ratio or BMI. A meta-analysis
Authors: Savva, Savvas C. 
Lamnisos, Demetris 
Kafatos, Anthony George 
Keywords: Body mass index;Cardiometabolic;Meta-analysis;Waist-to-height ratio
Category: Health Sciences
Field: Medical and Health Sciences
Issue Date: 23-Oct-2013
Publisher: Dove Medical Press Ltd.
Source: Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy, 2013, Volume 6, Pages 403-419
metadata.dc.doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S34220
Abstract: Background and objectives: The identification of increased cardiometabolic risk among asymptomatic individuals remains a huge challenge. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the association of body mass index (BMI), which is an index of general obesity, and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR), an index of abdominal obesity, with cardiometabolic risk in cross-sectional and prospective studies. Methods: PubMed and Embase databases were searched for cross-sectional or prospective studies that evaluated the association of both BMI and WHtR with several cardiometabolic outcomes. The strength of relative risk (RR) with 95% confdence interval (CI) was calculated using the optimal cutoffs of BMI and WHtR in cross-sectional studies, while any available cutoff was used in prospective studies. The pooled estimate of the ratio of RRs (rRR [=RRBMI/ RRWHtR]) with 95% CIs was used to compare the association of WHtR and BMI with car-diometabolic risk. Meta-regression was used to identify possible sources of heterogeneity between the studies. Results: Twenty-four cross-sectional studies and ten prospective studies with a total number of 512,809 participants were identifed as suitable for the purpose of this meta-analysis. WHtR was found to have a stronger association than BMI with diabetes mellitus (rRR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.59-0.84) and metabolic syndrome (rRR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.89-0.96) in cross-sectional studies. Also in prospective studies, WHtR appears to be superior to BMI in detecting several outcomes, including incident cardiovascular disease, cardiovascular disease mortality, and all-cause mortality. The usefulness of WHtR appears to be better in Asian than in non-Asian populations. BMI was not superior to WHtR in any of the outcomes that were evaluated. However, the results of the utilized approach should be interpreted cautiously because of a substantial heterogeneity between the results of the studies. Meta-regression analysis was performed to explain this heterogeneity, but none of the evaluated factors, ie, sex, origin (Asians, non-Asians), and optimal BMI or WHtR cutoffs were signifcantly related with rRR. Conclusion: The results of this meta-analysis support the use of WHtR in identifying adults at increased cardiometabolic risk. However, further evidence is warranted because of a substantial heterogeneity between the studies.
ISSN: 11787007
Rights: © 2013 Savva et al.
Type: Article
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Lamnisos.pdf541.94 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show full item record

Page view(s)

Last Week
Last month
checked on Feb 16, 2019

Download(s) 50

checked on Feb 16, 2019

Google ScholarTM


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.