Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ktisis.cut.ac.cy/handle/10488/8631
Title: Combination of chest compressions and interposed abdominal compressions in a swine model of ventricular fibrillation
Authors: Georgiou, Marios
Papathanassoglou, Elizabeth 
Middleton, Nicos 
Papalois, Apostolos
Xanthos, Theodoros
Keywords: Chest compressions;Swine model
Category: MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES
Field: Medical and Health Sciences
Issue Date: 2016
Publisher: Elsevier
Source: The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, Volume 34, Issue 6, Pages 968-974, 2016
Abstract: Purpose.The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of the combination of chest compressions and interposed abdominal compressions (IAC-CPR) in a swine model of ventricular fibrillation (VF).Methods Twenty healthy female Landrace-Large White pigs were the study subjects. At the end of the eighth minute of VF, animals in the control group (Group A) received chest compressions at a rate of 100/min, while animals in the experimental group received chest compressions and simultaneous interposed abdominal compressions (CC-IAC – Group B), both at a rate of 100/min. The primary end point of the experiment was return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Secondary outcomes were 48-h survival rate and 48-h neurologic outcome.Results.Six animals (60%) from Group A and 9 animals (90%) from Group B achieved ROSC (P = .121). There was a statistically significant difference in systolic aortic pressure, mean aortic pressure, right atrial pressures, and end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) between the two groups during the first cycle of CPR, while during the second cycle, diastolic aortic pressure was significantly higher in Group B. Coronary perfusion pressure (CPP) values in group B were significantly higher compared with those in Group A during the first and second cycle of CPR. Neurologic examination was statistically significantly better in Group B (75.00 ± 10.00 vs. 90.00 ± 10.00, P = .037).Conclusion ROSC did not differ statistically significant in the IAC-CPR compared to the CPR group only, while CPP was significantly higher in IAC-CPR–treated animals.
URI: http://ktisis.cut.ac.cy/handle/10488/8631
ISSN: 0735-6757
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2016.02.008
Rights: © 2016 Elsevier Inc.
Type: Article
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles

Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations 50

1
checked on Nov 16, 2017

Page view(s) 50

30
Last Week
1
Last month
1
checked on Nov 20, 2017

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.