Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Wear and biomechanical characteristics of a novel shear-reducing insole with implications for high-risk persons with diabetes
Authors: Constantinides, Georgios 
Lavery, Lawrence A. 
Lanctot, Dan R. 
Zamorano, Ruben G. 
Athanasiou, Kyriacos A. 
Agrawal, Mauli Mauli 
Keywords: Polyethylene;Vinyl acetate;Biomechanics;Viscoelasticity
Issue Date: 2005
Publisher: Mary Ann Liebert Inc.
Source: Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics,2005, Volume 7, Issue 4, Pages 638-646
Abstract: Objective: This study was designed to measure pressure and shear reduction of a novel insole design. Methods: We compared three multilayer viscoelastic insoles to a novel insole design (GlideSoft®, Xilas Medical, Inc., San Antonio, TX). The bottom pad of each insole was fabricated from firm-density Plastazote® [Apex Foot Products (now Aetrex), South Hackensack, NJ] with an upper of Plastazote, ethyl vinyl acetate, or PORON® (Langer Biomechanics Group, Inc., Deer Park, NY). The GlideSoft design used the same materials with two intervening thin sheets of a low friction material. We measured foot pressures, shear, and material stiffness prospectively as the insoles aged during daily usage in 30 healthy adults. We used the F-Scan® (Tekscan, Inc., Boston, MA) to determine in-shoe foot pressures and the Automated Stress-relaxation Creep Indenter System (Xilas Medical) to measure material stiffness. To evaluate shear force, the insole was placed on the slide assembly of a custom-designed shear tester equipped with a reciprocating mechanism and force transducers. Results: The GlideSoft exhibited 57% less peak shear force than the standard insole (P < 0.05) in laboratory testing under simulated conditions. Ethyl vinyl acetate had higher compressive stiffness values than Plastazote and PORON at all test intervals (P < 0.05). There were no statistical differences between any of the insoles for peak in-shoe pressure measurements (P > 0.05). Conclusions: The GlideSoft design demonstrated a significant reduction in shear while maintaining equivalent pressure reduction compared with standard insole designs with three different material combinations for up to 320,000 steps.
ISSN: 1520-9156
DOI: 10.1089/dia.2005.7.638
Rights: © Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
Type: Article
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles

Show full item record


checked on May 1, 2018

Page view(s)

Last Week
Last month
checked on Jan 22, 2019

Google ScholarTM



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.