Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Application of credibility ceilings probes the robustness of meta-Analyses of biomarkers and cancer risk||Authors:||Papatheodorou, Stefania ItemCrisRefDisplayStrategy.rp.deleted.icon
Tsilidis, Konstantinos K.
Ioannidis, John P. A.
Evangelou, Evangelos ItemCrisRefDisplayStrategy.rp.deleted.icon
|Keywords:||Biomarkers;Cancer;Credibility ceiling;Meta-Analyses;Predictive intervals||Category:||Clinical Medicine||Field:||Medical and Health Sciences||Issue Date:||1-Feb-2015||Publisher:||Elsevier B.V.||Source:||Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2015, Volume 68, Issue 2, Pages 163-174||Abstract:||Objectives Meta-Analyses of biomarkers often present spurious significant results and large effects. We applied sensitivity analyses with the use of credibility ceilings to assess whether and how the results of meta-Analyses of biomarkers and cancer risk would change. Study Design and Setting We evaluated 98 meta-Analyses, 43 (44%) of which had nominally statistically significant results. We assumed that any single study cannot give more than a maximum certainty 100 - c% (c, credibility ceiling) that the effect estimate [odds ratio (OR)] exceeds 1 (null) or 1.2. Results Nominal statistical significance was maintained for 21 (21%) meta-Analyses, for c = 10% and OR >1, and these proportions changed to 7%, 3%, and 6% with ceilings of 20%, 30%, and 40%, respectively. For ceilings for OR >1.2, the respective proportions were 37%, 21%, 7%, and 3%. Seven meta-Analyses on infectious agents retained statistical significance even with a high ceiling of c = 20% for OR >1.00. Meta-Analyses without other hints of bias (large between-study heterogeneity, small-study effects, excess significance) were more likely to retain statistical significance than those that had such hints of bias. Conclusion Credibility ceilings may be helpful in meta-Analyses of biomarkers to understand the robustness of the results to different levels of uncertainty.||URI:||http://ktisis.cut.ac.cy/handle/10488/4369||ISSN:||0895-4356||DOI:||http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.09.004||Rights:||© Elsevier Inc.||Type:||Article|
|Appears in Collections:||Άρθρα/Articles|
Show full item record
checked on Feb 13, 2018
Page view(s) 5056
checked on Feb 21, 2019
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.