Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://ktisis.cut.ac.cy/handle/10488/4174
Title: Determinants of procedural pain intensity in the intensive care unit: the Europain® study
Authors: Puntillo, Kathleen A. 
Max, Adeline 
Timsit, Jean-Francois 
Vignoud, Lucile 
Chanques, Gerald 
Gemma, Robleda 
Roche-Campo, Ferran 
Mancebo, Jordi 
Divatia, Jigeeshu V. 
Soares, Marcio 
Ionescu, Daniela C. 
Grintescu, Ioana M. 
Vasiliu, Irena L. 
Maurizio Maggiore, Salvatore 
Rusinova, Katerina 
Owczuk, Radoslaw 
Egerod, Ingrid 
Papathanassoglou, Elizabeth 
Kyranou, Maria 
Joynt, Gavin M. 
Burghi, Gaston 
Freebairn, Ross C. 
Ho, Kwok 
Kaarlola, Anne 
Gerritsen, Rik T. 
Kesecioglu, Jozef 
Sulaj, Miroslav M S 
Norrenberg, Michelle 
Benoit, Dominique D. 
Seha, Myriam S. G. 
Hennein, Akram 
Periera, Fernando J. 
Benbenishty, Julie S. 
Abroug, Fekri 
Aquilina, Andrew 
Monte, Julia R. C. 
An, Youzhong 
Azoulay, Elie 
Keywords: Symptom assessment;Analgesia;Prevention
Category: Health Sciences
Field: Medical and Health Sciences
Issue Date: 1-Jan-2014
Publisher: American Thoracic Society
Source: American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 2014, Volume 189, Issue 1, Pages 39–47
Abstract: Rationale:Intensive care unit (ICU) patients undergo several diagnostic and therapeutic procedures every day. The prevalence, intensity, and risk factors of pain related to these procedures are not well known. Objectives: To assess self-reported procedural pain intensity versus baseline pain, examine pain intensity differences across procedures, and identify risk factors for procedural pain intensity. Methods: Prospective, cross-sectional, multicenter, multinational study of pain intensity associated with 12 procedures. Data were obtained from 3,851 patients who underwent 4,812 procedures in 192 ICUs in 28 countries. Measurements andMain Results: Painintensity on a 0–10 numeric rating scale increased significantly from baseline pain during all procedures (P , 0.001). Chest tube removal, wound drain removal, and arterial line insertion were the three most painful procedures, with median pain scores of 5 (3–7), 4.5 (2–7), and 4 (2–6), respectively. By multivariate analysis, risk factors independently associated with greater procedural pain intensity were the specific procedure; opioid administration specifically for the procedure; preprocedural pain intensity; preprocedural pain distress; intensity of the worst pain on the same day, before the procedure; and procedure not performed by a nurse. A significant ICU effect was observed, with no visible effect of country because of its absorption by the ICU effect. Some of the risk factors became nonsignificant when each procedure was examined separately. Conclusions: Knowledge of risk factors for greater procedural pain intensity identified in this study may help clinicians select interventions that are needed to minimize procedural pain. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01070082).
URI: http://ktisis.cut.ac.cy/handle/10488/4174
ISSN: 1535-4970
10.1164/rccm.201306-1174OC
DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201306-1174OC
Rights: © American Thoracic Society
Type: Article
Appears in Collections:Άρθρα/Articles

Show full item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

89
checked on Feb 12, 2019

WEB OF SCIENCETM
Citations 1

80
checked on Feb 16, 2019

Page view(s) 50

67
Last Week
2
Last month
2
checked on Feb 20, 2019

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.