Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Harming Democracy in Mediolatry Societies: Decoding the Marketing of War and Animosities through Photo Images||Authors:||Gouliamos, Kosta
Theocharous, Antonis L.
Θεοχάρους, Αντώνης Λ.
|Keywords:||Animosities;Geopolitics;Marketing of war;Mediolatry;Neo-corporatism and democracy;Packaging politics;Photo images;Political marketing/communication||Category:||Other Social Sciences||Field:||Social Sciences||Issue Date:||2008||Source:||Journal of Political Marketing, Volume 7, Issue 3 & 4 September 2008 , pages 338 - 362||Abstract:||History can reveal a continuous stream of conflict, enmity, and violence. A general review of the world political scene presents an amalgam of stable and unstable countries/regions where acts of violence and conflict have been interwoven with the political lifeworld. Photo images are a powerful medium that greatly influences the interpretation of past events and the understanding of history. People often learn about events after they occur and depend either on social imagery (Newman, 1999) or on photography to construct cognitive frameworks about the past (Burke, 2001; Rose, 2001). Through the application of a symbolic interactionism methodological framework (Denzin, 1992), this paper explores how opinion leaders/decision makers perceive, understand, and interpret past political events as they are portrayed by photo images found in the international press. The interviewing and conversational analysis that has been adopted has allowed the comparison of the perspectives/interpretations given by the participants, something that ultimately has led to the extraction of conclusions on how people from different functions of democracy apparatus construct cognitive frameworks of political events according to their professional background. The imposition of mediolatry by “marketing war” or/and “packaging politics” denominators has encouraged the mobilization of democratic participation, while on the other hand, it has cultivated political cynicism about politicians' decisions or actions. The paper, through a qualitative approach and critical analysis, formulates two models that apprehend the generative process of terrorism, war, intervention, and ethnic cleansing, a process that undoubtedly harms modern democracy.||URI:||http://ktisis.cut.ac.cy/handle/10488/1091||ISSN:||1537-7865 (electronic)
|Appears in Collections:||Άρθρα/Articles|
Show full item record
checked on Dec 7, 2018
Page view(s) 5069
checked on Dec 11, 2018
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License