Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||The locus preservation hypothesis: Shared linguistic profiles across developmental disorders and the resilient part of the human language faculty||Authors:||Leivada, Evelina
Grohmann, Kleanthes K.
|Keywords:||Distributed morphology;Grammatical marker;Linguistic phenotype;Syntax;Autism spectrum disorders (ASD);Down Syndrome;Specific language impairment (SLI)||Category:||Clinical Medicine||Field:||Medical and Health Sciences||Issue Date:||13-Oct-2017||Publisher:||FRONTIERS MEDIA SA||Source:||FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, Volume: 8, Article Number: 1765, 2017||metadata.dc.doi:||10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01765||Journal:||Frontiers in Psychology||Abstract:||Grammatical markers are not uniformly impaired across speakers of different languages, even when speakers share a diagnosis and the marker in question is grammaticalized in a similar way in these languages. The aim of this work is to demarcate, from a cross-linguistic perspective, the linguistic phenotype of three genetically heterogeneous developmental disorders: specific language impairment, Down syndrome, and autism spectrum disorder. After a systematic review of linguistic profiles targeting mainly English-, Greek-, Catalan-, and Spanish-speaking populations with developmental disorders (n = 880), shared loci of impairment are identified and certain domains of grammar are shown to be more vulnerable than others. The distribution of impaired loci is captured by the Locus Preservation Hypothesis which suggests that specific parts of the language faculty are immune to impairment across developmental disorders. Through the Locus Preservation Hypothesis, a classical chicken and egg question can be addressed: Do poor conceptual resources and memory limitations result in an atypical grammar or does a grammatical breakdown lead to conceptual and memory limitations? Overall, certain morphological markers reveal themselves as highly susceptible to impairment, while syntactic operations are preserved, granting support to the first scenario. The origin of resilient syntax is explained from a phylogenetic perspective in connection to the "syntax-before-phonology" hypothesis.||URI:||http://ktisis.cut.ac.cy/handle/10488/10505||ISSN:||1664-1078||Rights:||Copyright © 2017 Leivada, Kambanaros and Grohmann||Type:||Article|
|Appears in Collections:||Άρθρα/Articles|
Show full item record
Files in This Item:
|Leivada Kambanaros Grohmann.pdf||980.07 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
checked on Dec 13, 2017
checked on Dec 13, 2017
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.