<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/">
  <channel>
    <title>Ktisis Collection: Βιβλία/Books</title>
    <link>http://ktisis.cut.ac.cy/handle/10488/4908</link>
    <description />
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li resource="http://ktisis.cut.ac.cy/handle/10488/1101" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
  </channel>
  <textInput>
    <title>The Collection's search engine</title>
    <description>Search the Channel</description>
    <name>search</name>
    <link>http://ktisis.cut.ac.cy/simple-search</link>
  </textInput>
  <item rdf:about="http://ktisis.cut.ac.cy/handle/10488/1101">
    <title>Model-Based Design Exploration of Wireless Sensor Node Lifetimes</title>
    <link>http://ktisis.cut.ac.cy/handle/10488/1101</link>
    <description>Title: Model-Based Design Exploration of Wireless Sensor Node Lifetimes&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Authors: Jung, Deokwoo; Teixeira, Thiago; Barton-Sweeney, Andrew; Savvides, Andreas&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Abstract: This paper presents two lifetime models that describe two of the most common modes of operation of sensor nodes today, trigger-driven and duty-cycle driven. The models use a set of hardware parameters such as power consumption per task, state transition overheads, and communication cost to compute a node’s average lifetime for a given event arrival rate. Through comparison of the two models and a case study from a real camera sensor node design we show how the models can be applied to drive architectural decisions, compute energy budgets and duty-cycles, and to preform side-by-side comparison of different platforms.</description>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

